Protecting Privacy in the Era of Artificial Intelligence


Abstract
Artificial Intelligence has emerged with real-time challenges as It has brought along with it both pros-cons, and the cons are needed to be fixed from the outset. As AI has a direct cohesion with data protection issues. If we are to cite an example that can be of an individual’s personal information which is hugely scrapped from almost all the platforms which have a colossal database. Now having cited this example invokes security issues in regard to the personal data of individuals. Whenever in recent scenarios of technological advancement any major challenges occur then we tend to be concerned for remedial measures which ultimately is the privacy of data principals.

However, these same technological innovations raise important issues, including a dilemma regarding the relation between AI and data protection laws that how can they supplement each other in sorting data related deformities. Now, this is the high time where we have both an opportunity and the obligation to examine the effectiveness of current data protection laws in light of 21st-century technological realities like challenges of AI.

While compliance with existing data protection laws is crucial, a long-lasting approach is to examine the challenges presented by AI as another wake-up call that our current approach to data protection is increasingly obsolete. Viewed in this light, it is a data protection law that must be improved if it is to protect privacy, effectively address the challenges presented by AI, and avoid creating unnecessary, bureaucratic barriers to AI’s benefits. The Five reforms appear necessary like, Shifting from Individual Consent to Data Stewardship, A More Systemic and Well-Developed utility of Risk Management, A Greater Focus on Data Uses and implications, A Framework of Harms and Transparency and Redress.

Keywords: Data protection, Artificial Intelligence, Privacy, Machine Learning, Automated facial recognition and legal ethics-AI

Read Full paper on:-https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3560047

Author(s) - Usama Mubarak & Keyur Tripathi.


Comments

Post a Comment

If you have any doubt just let me know

Popular posts from this blog

Image
Coercion Section 15  defines Coercion as follows : Coercion is committing or threatening to commit an act that is prohibited by IPC, or any unlawful detaining or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with an intention of causing any person into entering a contract. It is immaterial whether IPC is in operation at a place where such act took place. Illustrations A threatens B at gun point to sell his land to A. A while in an English ship on high seas enter into a contract with B by intimidating B that is unlawful in India. Later on A sues B of breach of contract in Calcutta. This is coercion. Chikham Amiraju vs Chikham Seshamma 1912  - Husband threatened to suicide unless wife gave property to his brother. This was held coercion. Askari Mirza vs Bibi Jai Kishori 1912  -  Threatening a criminal prosecution is not coercion per se. It could be coercion if the threat is to file false charges. Astley vs Reynolds 1731  - Plaintiff had pledged his place
Read more!

Residuary Powers (Art. 248)

Article 248: "Parliament has exclusive power to make any law with respect to any matter not enumerated in List II or III. Such power shall include the power of making any law imposing a tax not mentioned in either of those lists" (It is to be noted that before independence, Governor-General, and not the federal legislature, which had such powers). Entry 97 of List I also lays down that Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any matter not enumerated in List II or III. Article 248 and Entry 97, List I, assign residuary powers of legislation exclusively to the Union Parliament. If no entry in any of the three lists covers a piece of legislation, it must be regarded as a matter not enumerated in any of the three lists and belonging exclusively to Parliament under Entry 97, List I. By virtue of Art. 248, Parliament has exclusive power to make any law with respect to any matter not enumerated in List II or List III, and for this purpose, and to avoid any
Read more!

आत्मनिर्भर भारत - Self Reliant India

Image
Atmanirbharta or self-reliance is the new catchphrase for the Indian economy. It sounds new but is actually the earliest initiative of economic policymakers after this country attained independence. It flowed from the motto of swadeshi and boycott of colonial foreign goods that was an integral part of the freedom movement. The general public thus had no problem in accepting the ideas of self- reliance and import substitution advocated by Jawaharlal Nehru and his advisors as a critical element of economic policy. It gelled well with the theme of independence, not just from the colonial masters, but from imperialistic powers everywhere. In practice, of course, import substitution became one more element of red tape under the licence raj system that evolved under Nehru and his successors. It is with a sense of trepidation that one views the latest clarion call to achieve the goal of atmanirbharta. The last stimulus package was even described as the Atmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyaan. These
Read more!

amazon